Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1. CCP what's your plan for node crashing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Lord Zim wrote: I did not say "publish code", I said "causes". Ahhh. Like if there was errors in the code when N3PL use sentries? It's as if it's impossible to just be curious.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.12.20 22:38:00
|
2. CCP what's your plan for node crashing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Lord Zim wrote: CCP Veritas wrote: It's worth noting that in all recent events it hasn't been the high load that directly causes the node death, but rather errors in the programming that only express at high load or in ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.12.20 21:56:00
|
3. CCP what's your plan for node crashing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Veritas wrote: It's worth noting that in all recent events it hasn't been the high load that directly causes the node death, but rather errors in the programming that only express at high load or in the kind of highly complex scenarios that...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.12.20 19:17:00
|
4. High Sec POCO stupidity. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rita Riddick wrote: Let's change ALL the game mechanics to favor their situation. Pray tell, how do these game mechanics favor us more than anyone else?
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.12.01 16:18:00
|
5. High Sec POCO stupidity. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
More like Troll Hurt
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.11.25 19:02:00
|
6. Simple change to sov mechanics - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Homem na Estrada doesn't seem to be grasping what the problems with the sov system are, and seems to be treating the symptoms, rather than the cause.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.11.12 17:31:00
|
7. Simple change to sov mechanics - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
If you think the problem is squarely in the fact that some people don't have enough friends, or that there's no problem, then you have no clue just how bad the sov system is.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.11.11 16:48:00
|
8. Simple change to sov mechanics - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Your suggestions (the little I bothered to read of it) does not make it any easier for smaller entities to gain a foothold, since the problem isn't the fact that there are messages generated when something's attacked, the problem is the week of gr...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.10.02 17:38:00
|
9. What's up with 0.0 Sov Mechanics? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
heh ccp fix sov mechanics good one
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.10.02 17:17:00
|
10. Hi Sec POCO - in Science and Industry [original thread]
We're a kind and benevolent POCO master. There's nothing to worry about.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.09.26 21:26:00
|
11. Isotope prices on the rise - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Edit: All what it'd take to avoid misunderstandings would be a simple link in the contact us page that says: "Before contacting us for submitting an article, please review these rules: [Link to one of the various calls ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.07 08:56:00
|
12. Isotope prices on the rise - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Tell us more about how you not following the procedure for becoming a writer is our fault, and how telling you what the requirements are is "us looking dumb" because the guy used a quote from 2013 to describe a process which hasn't changed substan...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.07 01:10:00
|
13. Isotope prices on the rise - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: That's still too new Irrelevant.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.06 20:42:00
|
14. Isotope prices on the rise - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: That's one topic. Quoting a July 2013 article along with the "no reading comprehension" for a submission meant for 1+ year ago is another. If he wants to be witty, he should not look dumb in the process. The only one...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.06 20:34:00
|
15. Isotope prices on the rise - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Add some more Goons in this thread patting each other and the forums go TiDi. "please stop posting against me :(" Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: And he's trying to prove that I did not even read the "send text with 800 char...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.06 20:21:00
|
16. Isotope prices on the rise - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Dear friend, this is not in game EvE content: blobbing 10000 vs 1 does not work here. This paragraph makes no sense. Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Let's talk about inability to read: the text you posted comes from an arti...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.06 20:03:00
|
17. Isotope prices on the rise - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: mynnna wrote: That didn't take long. Sounds a bit dumb, why interdict in the month with the least miners online? Don't tell me that goons started looking at price action and want to amplify it. *Shows Mittani.com...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.06 19:38:00
|
18. The anti- CFC fund - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have 17 million, how can I help?
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.06 12:30:00
|
19. Sticky:Dev Blog: Battle for 6VDT-H - summary and numbers - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
TravelBuoy wrote: 52 minutes needed to kill with a fully megathron fleet a single prophecy, this is a ridiculous thing. Prophecies suck. Get a better fleet doctrine.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.01 16:01:00
|
20. Sticky:Dev Blog: Battle for 6VDT-H - summary and numbers - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Qestroy wrote: stop digging at test for being more "don't give a ****, its a game" than goonswarm and the clusterfuck coalition... That's a different tune than you guys were singing prior to Z9PP, because prior to Z9PP you were winning. Now y...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.01 10:41:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |